The COP30 Just Transition Work Programme (JTWP) decision embedded human rights, labour rights, gender, and care at the heart of climate action. For the Women & Gender Constituency (WGC) Just Transition Working Group, it was also a moment to see many hours, weeks, and months of work on the just transition mechanism yield tangible results.
As multilateral processes become increasingly complex and advocacy becomes more urgent, the WGC Just Transition Working Group (JTWG) meets the moment in a different way. Feminists carve out time for collective learning and capacity building through group teach-ins; UN submissions are built, discussed, debated, and written collectively; younger feminists are mentored through complex UNFCCC processes and encouraged to bring their ideas; and the group shares an understanding that everyone has the capacity for expertise and that the more democratised our knowledge, the more sustainable our movements are. In 2025, the JTWG showed how these feminist ways of working can translate into real outcomes for climate justice.
To understand exactly how feminists were crucial in shaping the BAM proposal, we first need to understand the context we were working in at the start of 2025. COP29 in Baku ended without progress on the Just Transition Work Programme, with negotiations ending without an agreement or decision. This lack of progress on just transition at COP29 meant that a strong outcome on Just Transition at COP30 seemed even less likely. Leadership and political imagination were clearly needed, and civil society and trade unions stepped up.
Starting in January 2025, the feminists in the Women & Gender Constituency Just Transition Working Group spent months mapping, researching, brainstorming, designing, critiquing, and redesigning to produce the first-ever prototype of a global just transition mechanism — what would later become the cross-constituency proposal to establish the Belém Action Mechanism for a Global Just Transition, or BAM.